Toward the Truth
  • When Picking Teams Poisons the Playground
  • Great Again vs Better Now
  • Is the SBC Retreating from Culture War?
  • When Being Biblical Is Bull
  • Evangelicals in the Age of Trump: "Poor Jesus"
  • Bad News from Good News People
  • The Strength of Confession
  • On The Nashville Statement
  • When A Shepherd Fails
  • Come Unto Me
  • The Right Hand of Presidential Power: Christian Sharia?
  • Fairness, But Not Fealty
  • Women, You Are Not a Temptation
  • The Southern Baptist Convention’s New Conservative Resurgence
  • Fasting Indifference So We Might Feast on Love
  • On the Occasion of a Presidential Address
  • God Never Left the Public Schools
  • This World Is Our Home
  • Count the Cost
  • When You Gain the World
  • #50ShadesOfPurple
  • An Open Letter to Franklin Graham
  • Opposition Party?
  • A Summary of the Book of Amos
  • I Am a Son of the South
  • The Pope and Glyzelle: The Question for Which There Is No Answer
  • On Being Anglican
  • These Will Have to Do
  • Hope Is. . .
  • The Lightest Burden
  • Shadow Boxing
  • God Who Raises the Dead
  • The Lesson of the Manna
  • The Gospel of Matthew
  • The Devil's Bread
  • Fear No Evil
  • From That Night to This Day
  • On Dust & Trust
  • Saved From Faith
  • A Remarkable Ratification
  • A Dose of the Best Medicine
  • Thou Shalt Covet
  • Jesus Isn't All You Need
  • From the Dust
  • When Wonder Brings Hardening
  • Sitting Down at the Table Together
  • On Terrorism and Torture: When Good Prevails
  • Frequently and Thoroughly
  • Love that Seeks and Holds

Biblical Justice

11/9/2018

0 Comments

 
When we hear someone say they think people should be “biblical,” our ears here at Toward the Truth perk up. When we learn that the just appointed interim Attorney General of the United States has said he supports a “biblical view of justice,” and a “New Testament” one at that, our ears are maximally perked.
 
This, we think, an instance where we know what Matthew Whitaker means when he says “biblical,” but we’re not sure Mr Whitaker knows what he means, if what he means to say is that he wants our nation’s justice system to be formed by what the Bible means. (Follow that?)
 
Whatever it is that Mr Whitaker means, if he wants the laws of the US to reflect New Testament justice, we should expect he’ll soon be counseling the president of the United States to:
  • Compassionately provide for those who lack what they need
  • Welcome immigrant strangers into our country
  • Provide for the health of sick people
  • Work for the good of those in prison
And all that’s just from one little passage in Matthew 25. What a revolutionary view of a national justice system! As James envisaged it, a “biblical” view of justice is that mercy triumphs over judgment. What a nation that would be!
 
We’ve said before that there is a great deal of confusion about how Christianity intersects with governance of our nation. The framers were quite reflective about such issues; we note the first amendment for Mr Whitaker’s consideration. In the meantime, we’d be thrilled to see the US Justice Department under the purview of Mr Whitaker come closer to a New Testament vision of justice in the days to come.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.